So, if this is correct, and AA is transported via Svct2 and not Glut, then I suspect the chances that Chromium would have any beneficial effect on increasing the movement of AA into cells is a bit lower.
There is nothing here that disputes value of Chromium regarding to bioavailablity of vitamin C.
When there is some form of cellular stress, free radicals are usually involved. Those will quickly oxidise vitamin C to DHA and its concentration will be higher. In some disease states ratio of AA/DHA could be as low as 0.7, while it is normally very high (can't remember exact number but somewhere around 10 or 15). On such locations, given enough GLUT receptors and insulin sensitivity DHA will probably be recycled faster.
Since Cr also helps in diabets by reducing insulin resistance and blood glucose levels, according to initial post where scientists show that glucose blocks SVCT from the inside of the cell, it can be concluded that SVCT receptors will be more efficient.
Also, it makes logical sense - vitamin C and glucose are very similar - C is made from Glu, both use GLUT receptors, both influence insulin levels and so on - it certainly does make sense that achieving optimal control of one will influence another.