McCullogh: Cancer Virus Found in Covid Shots

[ofonorow]

https://www.infowars.com/posts/dr-peter-mccullough-issues-emergency-warning-cancer-virus-found-in-covid-shots/

[Saw]

McCullough also thinks there's a pandemic with a novel virus. And apparently believes anything published in a medical paper is gospel.

[ofonorow]

I agree this is not really news. After all, we know, thanks to Dr. Tent, that cancer causing viruses have been in vaccines since the beginning in the early 1960s.

[Saw]

Viruses only exist in ones mind.
Poison will create cancer.

[ofonorow]

Viruses only exist in ones mind.
Poison will create cancer.

Ironically, there are rarely viruses in the brain.

Viral denial does not help your credibility sir.

[Saw]

Viruses only exist in ones mind.
Poison will create cancer.

Ironically, there are rarely viruses in the brain.

Viral denial does not help your credibility sir.

Still pushing the virus story are we.
Actually the brain is the only place viruses exist, since they are strictly a mental concept.

[ofonorow]

The fairly large "anti viral" movement is the definition of "anti-science" and illustrates precisely why science is so important. I am thinking about writing a book about this. The Anti-viralists are attacking a well established science, although criticism is fine, this attack has no scientific merit, and is apparently attractive emotionally to a lot of well-meaning people, especially in the era of the mystery of COVID. It reminds me of the vitamin C complex, no science and an emotional appeal. (And the same people are behind both. Quite a coincidence.)

But COVID is a mystery no more.

When the first Medical Medium book was originally published, it was long before COVID. Recently, the first first book was republished as the "Revised and Expanded" edition. It covers COVID (which is a virus) and explains that when first released (in China) it was a new virus and no one had immunity against it. This made it virulent. But as the virus was passed from person to person, as immunity developed, it weakened. Here are Mr. Williams own words on the matter:

COVID is a virus that is alive. It is not an RNA strand that is dead, or fragments of information from the virus itself.

The Flu is also a living virus.

The flu and COVID are manufactured viruses. They've been raised in labs, experimented with, tested with and fed foods to stay alive. COVID and the flu virus compete with each other.

We are in an age today where viruses don't just appear. They are manipulated, altered, and sometimes even created through purposely mutating original, natural, docile strains of viruses found in our natural environment.

The specific original strain of COVID that found its way into people recently was far more aggressive at the very beginning, because it had never entered human beings before. As it passes through the human population, it became less aggressive (unless it's competing with a very aggressive flu strain) -- so it goes through millions of people, COVID loses strength because it has to battle the human immune system along the way. Each person's immune system battles and fights COVID and over time, as it's entering more and more people, the virus itself changes and weakens.

COVID hit the human race hard upon arrival. Over time, it dumbs down as the human immune system shapes it, changes it, and weakens it -- meaning that eventually, we aren't going to be contending with the most aggressive strain. As the years go on, we'll be contending with a milder form of this current version of COVID. That doesn't mean that a new variety of COVID won't enter the population through manufacturing sticking us back in the same position we're in with this variety (March, 2021)

Mr. William points out that this behavior is unlike the EBV virus responsible for so much chronic illness, which has been mutating and growing "stronger" over time.

[Saw]

The fairly large "anti viral" movement is the definition of "anti-science" and illustrates precisely why science is so important. I am thinking about writing a book about this. The Anti-viralists are attacking a well established science, although criticism is fine, this attack has no scientific merit, and is apparently attractive emotionally to a lot of well-meaning people, especially in the era of the mystery of COVID. It reminds me of the vitamin C complex, no science and an emotional appeal. (And the same people are behind both. Quite a coincidence.)

Virology has nothing to do with science.
Your quote is inverted in it's entirety!
Every "virus" is made up

[ofonorow]

As I said, your definitive statements are not supported by any facts. They do not help your credibility and this is why I stopped reading your mammoth "cover story" topic. I'm not surprised that you and others believe such nonsense, but I am surprised by how many others.

And yes I see the irony that while I am promoting a scientific approach (which you either reject or ignore), I have started promoting the medical medium - which also seems on the surface to be based on faith.

I thought you would be happy that the advanced science removed the mystery behind COVID? It is a flu-like virus, developed in a lab (as the flu was we are told), and was so virulent early because no human had immunity against it.

And if you can step back and look at your anti-viralist's views from another perspective, maybe you will see how you are being "used?" It is an obvious disinformation effort designed to deflect from the fact that bio-weapons labs not only exist that manufacture and mutate viruses. Remember what we learned from the O'Keefe (operation veritas) date with that high level Pfizer employee? Big Pharma experiments with "gain of function" so they can have vaccines ready and waiting after the next (deliberate) outbreak.

[Saw]

It may turn out there are invisible particles that spread illness but that would be separate from virology.

Fascinating how you can be shown the large and extreme experiments from the 1918 flu showing they could not infect a single
participant even after spraying "infectious" material of the most virulent of all "viruses" in the nose,mouth,eyes and this creates no doubt for you.

Or the HIV study showing the "virus" could not be spread to a single person during 10 years. That created zero doubt.

Even when presented with the proper control experiments showing "virus" could be cultured out of nothing, just vero cells and the standard toxins (no virus added) even that didn't create a shred of doubt.

Or when the entire SarrsCov2 sequence could be found in pure yeast at only 30 PCR cycles
(pandemic standard is 35 to 45) and that was meaningless for you.

And now you see how alignment is done, a puzzle with about 30,000 pieces with no point of reference and millions of
possible combinations, where they basically guess what it looks like. And you... Crickets.

[ofonorow]

[Saw]

[ofonorow]

[Saw]

Angues and Bustos just released a paper on the Authorea preprint server that assemblies the evidence to date that both mRNA and the Spike protein work within human cells to cause changes that result in oncogenesis. The figure shown is consistent with a multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis after injection with Pfizer or Moderna.

Science likes to complicate everything.
If there are in fact liposomes in these injections the PEG itself is enough to give you cancer

Polyethylene glycols (PEGs) are composed of polyether compounds repeating ethylene glycol units according to the constituent monomer or parent molecule (as ethylene glycol, ethylene oxide, or oxyethylene)

All the ingredients are cancerous. We're talking about plastic liposomes after all, what could go wrong.

How long would Liveon labs be in business if they made their Lipo-C with this stuff.

[ofonorow]